Teachers all over are beginning to freak out about now.
So if the standards are telling us that in order to be fluent, kids need to be flexible, accurate, efficient, and appropriate, what the heck does that even mean for our instruction? Not to mention, how does running copies from mathdrills.com help us achieve that goal? How do we teach kids to be fluent? What are the best practices??? A great question from my good friend Katie: If we don't use timed tests, how do we monitor our students' fluency? Which lead me to my next question... What are we really monitoring with timed tests anyway? How is using assessments such as these helping us toward our goal of knowing some answers, using patterns, and using strategies?
In my own humble opinion here, I think what is happening is that teachers don't want to let go of one thing until we have another to hold onto. A question I have for myself is, how do we help teachers develop enough confidence in better instructional practices that they would be willing to let go of not the old, but really in this case, the harmful? I have some thoughts... but I am more interested in yours.
So where do we go? What do we do? One of the best answers I know of is Number Talks. We as teachers, cannot afford to say that we don't have time for Number Talks, I don't care what grade you teach. In my head, I figure you either pay for it in the beginning or the end. Isn't it usually cheaper in the beginning?
The Number Talks TrainingThe last month or so my coworker/friend Stephanie & I have been working on some professional development for teachers surrounding fluency and specifically Number Talks. Teachers had some introductory training on Number Talks a year or two ago and they have tried it out, some more than others. Over time some took off and did great things, while others kind of fizzled out or didn't grow into what they could have. So, why is that? In my own opinion... The first reason pains me to say it, but it's the same problem we have with an over reliance on publisher's curriculum. We don't trust ourselves, so we trust the curriculum that's given to us. "The people that wrote it must know more than we do, otherwise they wouldn't be writing curriculum?!" (topic for another day) Another is that it takes time to thoughtfully plan Number Talks and we are already overwhelmed.
So again, how do we help teachers grab onto something new and really give it their all? Teachers need to be comfortable with it, they need to understand it, they need to understand that it's good for kids. There's already a progression laid out, but they need to "understand why the wheel works." (Thanks K)
To start off we modeled a number talk with the teachers and we showed one from a first grade class as well.
Then, we began by working on a progression of fluency. I teach first grade, and let me tell you there is a lot going on in kindergarten that kids have to have before they can even think at working on addition and subtraction strategies to build fluency. In our training we used this progression that Graham Fletcher shared. The framework and progressions documents go through the same big ideas, but they don't have a nice chart - all in one place.
Teachers had sheets of paper with the name of each big idea and they were asked to draw a picture of what it looked like when a kid was doing that. Then, we asked them to put them in order on a long sheet of butcher paper. We went through them and talked about the controversy at the beginning (perceptual subtilizing) (thank you to my #MTBOS crew, especially Mark Chubb who helped me with that ahead of time), we talked about why one thing went to another. We also put up Stephanie's butcher paper from the 3rd-5th grade fluency progressions - Number Talks training to see how one grade span built up to the next. It's one long skills/understandings progression.
After building the progression we asked teachers to work together and identify where they thought the bulk of the class was at in the progression, and then to plan out about five Number Talks that would help build that understanding. Teachers did a lot of sharing about what was going on in their classrooms. Toward the end we shared resources for number talks like Sherry Parrish's books - there is a list of strategies at the front so teachers could turn to that if they need help identifying what type of Number Talk would help elicit a certain strategy. We also shared the link to Ryan Dent's site that has a ton of slides for Number Talks. Finally, we offered to plan, demonstrate, or to help with whatever teachers needed to successfully implement Number Talks in their classrooms.
Obviously, Number Talks is not the only way to build fluency, but can you really name one other single practice that tackles flexibility, accuracy, efficiency, and appropriateness? All in one shot?
Another one of my personal favorites for building fluency are estimation tasks like Estimation 180 from the infamous Andrew Stadel, (Ryan Dent has a K-2 version of 40+ slides.) Want to make kids slow down and make sense of problems while focusing on reasonableness? This is for you!
So, is there ever a time that kids practice basic facts with naked numbers? (naked numbers = no context)
Um, yes. What if we just did it differently? What if instead of printing out pages from mathdrills.com you used thoughtfully selected problems that could show mastery of certain strategies? What if you monitored things like: counting on, uses make 10 strategy, doubles, near doubles, compensation, properties of operations, etc... instead of just "fluent." Think about how much more it tells parents if we explicitly share what we are looking for in a student that is truly fluent. Without that information, what is a parent likely to do to help their child become more fluent?
Yep. Obviously, they are going to do what they know. Why wouldn't they? That's all any of us can do. "When you know better, you do better."